Flat Earth Follies: Survey Says...

This time around we're going to look at some data using the National Geodetic Survey Data Explorer.

I'm just going to pull up some Geodetic Survey marker data for markers lying very near the ocean and we're going to see what shape it describes.  You can see the Ortho Height for each marker is under 2 meters.

Click on the link in the caption for each image to pull up the raw NGS datasheet on each one.

Our first target is down in the very tip of Texas near Port Isabel...

NGS DP0739
In this case we find the NAD 83 XYZ coordinates from the datasheet are:

DP0739 NAD 83(2011) X -   -716,721.076 (meters) COMP 
DP0739 NAD 83(2011) Y - -5,688,867.995 (meters) COMP 
DP0739 NAD 83(2011) Z -  2,784,100.512 (meters) COMP

Next stop is New Orleans...

NGS BJ1342
Where we find BJ1342 at these coordinates:

BJ1342  NAD 83(2011) X  -    -10,884.151 (meters)  COMP
BJ1342  NAD 83(2011) Y  - -5,526,738.137 (meters)  COMP
BJ1342  NAD 83(2011) Z  -  3,172,935.167 (meters)  COMP

And finally we're going to over to Miami, Florida for AA5493:

NGS AA5493

at these coordinates:

AA5493  NAD 83(2011) X  -    983,140.199 (meters)  COMP
AA5493  NAD 83(2011) Y  - -5,664,838.225 (meters)  COMP
AA5493  NAD 83(2011) Z  -  2,751,785.275 (meters)  COMP

So now we can look at these coordinates and see what "level" might be (and you can pull them up yourself and verify my information).

Note: we're only looking at the rough coordinates - there is additional data such how the surface of the Earth has moved over time (for example due to earthquakes, see HTDP solutions) that would be required for exacting measurements - but we're looking at markers that are about 1058 miles apart so a few inches of movement wouldn't make any difference.

See FAQs on 'DATUMS AND DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS'

So let's drop these into GeoGeobra and plot out our markers.

First, Earth is roughly an ellipsoidal surface defined by WGS-84 as having axes 6378137 meters by 6356752.3 meters (aka, oblate spheroid) so we can input this:

a=Surface(6378.137cos(u)cos(v),6378.137sin(u)cos(v),6356.7523sin(v),u,0,2π,v,0,2π)

In my example I've shaved off some unused portion of the ellipsoid to make rendering faster by dropping the 2 out of the 2π's but make sure the portion you need is included or just include the whole surface as above.

Next, we create our points:

A=Point({-716.721076,-5688.867995,2784.100512})

B=Point({-10.884151, -5526.738137, 3172.935167})

C=Point({983.140199, -5664.838225, 2751.85275})

And we can draw some line segments between them:

Segment(A,B)

Segment(B,C)

And our result we can see are well fit to the Earth model.

GeoGebra 3D plot of our three survey points on Earth ellipsoid
So now you have a massive database of actual measurements of Earth's curvature at your fingertips.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pic Gaspard (3880m)/Grand Ferrand (2758m) from Pic de Finestrelles (2826m) in the Pyrénées

Image
I have some new toys to share in this installment of 'Yes, the Earth really is Curved even though you can see one distant mountain peak from another', so this should be fun! This time we're going to look at a view of two distant mountains from Pic de Finestrelles (2826m) in the Pyrénées , taken by Marc Bret of Beyond Horizons (see also the Flickr album ). Pic Gaspard (3880m) in the Massif des Écrins range at a distance of 443 km. Grand Ferrand (2758m) at a distance of 392.48 km. Our view is right around 42.414466°N, 2.132839°E at about 2826 meters elevation, looking right along the coast. Pic Gaspard/Grand Ferrand from Pic de Finestrelles in the Pyrénées, image by Marc Bret The EXIF metadata shows this image was taken by a Panasonic DMC-FZ72 with a focal length of 215mm -- given the 5.62 crop factor of the 1/2.3" sensor in this camera, this gives you a 35mm equivalent focal length of 1200mm giving a full frame view of 1.644° wide and 1.215° high. Since 1521 x 101...
Read more

Flat Earth Follies: Planes would have to constantly pitch down to fly!

Image
Flat Earth Claim Planes would have to constantly pitch down to fly! Short Version In the Globe model "LEVEL" follows a sphere of uniform gravity potential. Feel free to disprove that is the case if you can but that is the model. In an airplane, Elevator Trim simply controls the RATE of pitch of an aircraft - not the actual pitch of the plane. A 747 flying at 35,000' would have a flight circumference of  about 2π*(3959+(35000/5280)) ≈ 24916 miles Flying at 570 miles per hour, this plane would fly a fraction of the 360° around given by 360*570/24916 Since that's 1 hour we can divide by 60 to get the degrees per hour: 360*570/24916/60 ≈ 0.137°/minute That is down in the noise since pitch rate is affected by temperature, density, power, and control settings on the plane you simply trim the plane for as close to ZERO vertical speed as you can and you've automatically compensated for all of them at once.  Of course, on a 747 computers do that.  In a small plane the pitc...
Read more

Flat Earth Follies: vacuum of space would suck the atmosphere off the Earth

Image
Flat Earth Claim The vacuum of space would suck the atmosphere off the Earth! Figure 1 - Flat Earth Meme Facts The vacuum of space (or any other vacuum) does not 'suck' things into it. It has no energy or force with which to do so. What we need to be concerned about are the forces contained in the mass that is adjacent to the vacuum to see if they are sufficient to hold the matter together against their own thermodynamic energy. First let's work through a simpler example of a marble adrift in space. There are intermolecular forces within the glass of the marble that are holding the atoms bound together, these forces are sufficient to prevent the silicon dioxide (SiO₂) molecules in the glass from flying off the marble and into space due to their thermodynamic forces under normal circumstances (hopefully we can agree on that). However, if we heat that marble up eventually some of those silicon dioxide molecules will have enough energy to break those bonds and separate int...
Read more