We know astronauts are lying because they wouldn't swear on a Bible...

I keep seeing this bit of trash make the rounds and while I normally avoid "Moon Hoaxers" (I have enough to do, I leave that to folks like Astrobrant2) I thought I would at least take down this one bit of stupidity since it's so easy and it'll make it easier for me to reference later and I get to point everyone to Astrobrant2 :) ...

Does Bart Sibrel make money off claiming they didn't?

#1 Here is one doing so:



#2 And from Moon Hoax: Debunked! we see 3 cases where they did:


[link to a lot of debunking]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pic Gaspard (3880m)/Grand Ferrand (2758m) from Pic de Finestrelles (2826m) in the Pyrénées

Image
I have some new toys to share in this installment of 'Yes, the Earth really is Curved even though you can see one distant mountain peak from another', so this should be fun! This time we're going to look at a view of two distant mountains from Pic de Finestrelles (2826m) in the Pyrénées , taken by Marc Bret of Beyond Horizons (see also the Flickr album ). Pic Gaspard (3880m) in the Massif des Écrins range at a distance of 443 km. Grand Ferrand (2758m) at a distance of 392.48 km. Our view is right around 42.414466°N, 2.132839°E at about 2826 meters elevation, looking right along the coast. Pic Gaspard/Grand Ferrand from Pic de Finestrelles in the Pyrénées, image by Marc Bret The EXIF metadata shows this image was taken by a Panasonic DMC-FZ72 with a focal length of 215mm -- given the 5.62 crop factor of the 1/2.3" sensor in this camera, this gives you a 35mm equivalent focal length of 1200mm giving a full frame view of 1.644° wide and 1.215° high. Since 1521 x 101
Read more

Deconstructed - Auguste Piccard: “It seemed a flat disk with upturned edge”

Image
Deconstructed - Auguste Piccard: “It seemed a flat disk with upturned edge” Is it possible he means it looked like an upturned disk?  As in, you see a bit of horizon curvature? Stratobowl image from 1935 The human eye has a wide field of view so you see a bit more of the Horizon Circle than most images and thus more curvature, all else being equal. One reason for this is that this is NOT the "curvature of the Earth" -- this is the curvature of the Horizon Sagitta viewed nearly on edge .  This is a mistake I constantly see people making.  So it's not a circle of 3959 miles diameter that curved downward, but an OVAL that you are in the middle of with, in this case, a 300 mile radius and viewed on edge at a 4.8° angle -- and this oval curves 360° around YOU. As to why it looks flat, it's because the terrain is far away and the curvature is fairly slight and you're looking down on it.  We just cannot see the geometry under these conditions.  You can't even see the
Read more

Flat Earth Follies: Another Mountain, Another Flat Earth Failure

Image
Flat Earther calling himself 'W@keTheF@keUp' tried to claim that because we can see Mt. Rainer from Brunswick Mountain that the Earth is 'flat' and of course, he can prove it, by utterly failing at math (which he apparently took from Mr. Thrive and Survive - can't even do his own analysis). @ColdDimSum disproven. even on top of Brunswick using exact math of you globetards mt Rainer can not be seen You failed 😢 #itsflat pic.twitter.com/Gd5UcPnzfq — 🔥W@keTheF@keUp🔥 (@5tate0fan3nemy) November 29, 2016 Of course, he also tried to claim that "Canada is 917 miles from Mount Rainer". @djboptics Distance from Rainer to Canada is 917 miles. 8 in per sq mile. 917x8=7336 inches of curve should be missing lol. I'm done here lmao — 🔥W@keTheF@keUp🔥 (@5tate0fan3nemy) October 28, 2016 Eventually, contradicting himself, he claims it is 193.8 miles from Brunswick Mountain to Mt. Rainer - which seems to be accurate as we find in PeakFinder: Figure 1. PeakFinder
Read more